The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) has declared a religious structure near Terminal 2 of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport unauthorised, after an inspection found that it had been constructed without the required planning permissions or statutory approvals.
The action follows complaints regarding alleged unauthorised construction near airport land. During its verification, MMRDA found no sanctioned building plan or other official permission for the structure.
MMRDA Directs Demolition
Following the findings, the authority has issued notices to Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL) directing the agency to remove and demolish the structure.
Officials have emphasised the importance of keeping areas surrounding the airport’s operational and security zones free from unauthorised development. The structure is reportedly located close to facilities associated with VIP movements, taxi parking and terminal operations, raising concerns about the potential impact of unregulated construction on airport security and functioning.
The matter is now being examined by MIAL and local police authorities, which will have to coordinate arrangements before the proposed clearance action is carried out.
Somaiya Seeks Criminal Action
Former BJP MP Kirit Somaiya has called for action beyond demolition. He has sought the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against the managing trustees and others allegedly involved in constructing the structure.
Somaiya has also described the alleged occupation of the land as “Land Jihad” and urged the authorities to identify those responsible and initiate appropriate legal proceedings.
His remarks have added a political dimension to the dispute, which centres on the alleged unauthorised use of land near one of Mumbai’s most strategically sensitive infrastructure facilities.
Security and Planning Rules in Focus
The controversy has renewed attention on development controls around international airports, where construction activity is subject to multiple planning, security and operational considerations.
Authorities are expected to assess the exact procedures required for removal while ensuring that the operation does not interfere with airport activity or passenger movement.
The next steps are likely to involve implementation of the MMRDA directive by MIAL and a decision on Somaiya’s demand for criminal proceedings.
The case also highlights the importance of enforcing planning regulations around high-security infrastructure, particularly in areas where unauthorised structures could affect access, security arrangements or the smooth functioning of airport facilities.
Source: Lokmat Times
