In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has stepped into the ongoing dispute surrounding a major infrastructure project in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR). On Monday, a bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice A.G. Masih questioned the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA)’s decision to disqualify Larsen & Toubro (L&T) — one of India’s leading infrastructure firms — on technical grounds.
The disqualification has sparked a legal battle that could delay the ambitious project, which aims to establish the country’s second-longest twin tunnel and elevated road after the Atal Setu. Intended to boost east-west connectivity between Thane and Bhayander, the project is critical to reducing congestion in this rapidly urbanising corridor.
L&T approached the Supreme Court after the Bombay High Court’s vacation bench dismissed its plea on 20 May. The firm argued that it was unfairly declared technically non-responsive despite meeting all eligibility norms and possessing an exceptional track record, including work on Delhi’s Central Vista redevelopment. MMRDA countered that it was not required to disclose disqualification details during the bidding phase.
While the High Court acknowledged L&T’s concerns regarding lack of transparency, it noted the company’s prior acceptance of the tender’s terms weakened its case. However, the court ordered financial bids to remain sealed for two weeks, allowing L&T to appeal.
The apex court has not issued a formal stay but asked MMRDA to consult with the Maharashtra state government on the possibility of re-tendering. A decision is expected by Thursday.
Legal observers note that the outcome may set vital precedents for future public tenders, highlighting the judiciary’s growing focus on procedural fairness, transparency, and public accountability in mega urban projects.
Source: Urban Acres
